collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1772 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25062
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21839
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Blue mountains deer permit by teanawayslayer
[Today at 02:53:47 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by pianoman9701
[Today at 02:25:13 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by dilleytech
[Today at 01:46:14 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by bearhunter99
[Today at 10:42:41 AM]


Skagit Question by Mfowl
[Today at 09:59:56 AM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by JBG
[Today at 09:33:34 AM]


A legend passed :( by Machias
[Today at 09:26:39 AM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by C-Money
[Today at 09:02:23 AM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by stickflngr
[Today at 08:45:51 AM]


Chinook run by buglebuster
[Today at 08:39:03 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by buglebuster
[Today at 08:31:55 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:22:47 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:11:37 AM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by FlyFish360
[Today at 06:48:21 AM]


How much do you think my truck is worth? by FlyFish360
[Today at 02:06:54 AM]


Bullet performance 2025? by Rigby416
[Today at 12:28:20 AM]


SPIKE??? by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:24:51 PM]


Manulife (Hancock) Land Closures by MMCCAULEY
[Yesterday at 08:25:39 PM]


Where do the bulls go? by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 05:57:19 PM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 04:52:10 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal